Process for hydrorefining hydrocarbons with a catalytic mixture of individually-supported active components



nits ttes US. Cl. 208-216 8 Claims ABSTRACT OF THE DXSCLUSURE An improvement in a process for hydrorefining nitrogen and sulfur-contaminated hydrocarbons which comprises contacting the hydrocarbons with molecular hydrogen under hydrogenation conditions in the presence of a physical mixture of (A) a catalyst having a hydrogenation activity of at least 1.1, and a denitrogenation activity less than 0.7 and (B) a catalyst having a hydrogenation activity of less than 1.0, a denitrogenation activity of at least 0.2 and a ratio of denitrogenation activity to hydrogenation activity of at least 0.6. The weight ratio of catalyst (A) to catalyst (B) is from about 3 :1 to about 1:3 and the physical mixture of the catalysts is such that catalysts (A) and (B) are individually supported on discrete particles.

This invention relates to the hydrorefining of mineral oils such as petroleum, coal tar or shale oil hydrocarbon fractions which in many cases contain non-hydrocarbon impurities, and particularly relates to a catalyst composition comprised of a physical mixture of a hydrogenation catalyst and a denitrogenation catalyst which is especially suited for the hydrofining of these hydrocarbon stocks. The overall catalyst compositions of this invention exhibit unusually high activities for denitrogenation, desulfurization and hydrogenation of olefins, aromatics, etc., of said hydrocarbon fractions.

The presence of sulfur and nitrogen in hydrocarbon oils has long been recognized as undesirable. Nitrogen compounds have a poisoning effect as they often tend to reduce or destroy the activity of catalysts employed to convert, e.g., crack, these stocks. The higher the nitrogen content of the charge stock, the higher will be the temperature required to eifect a given amount of conversion which eventually requires more frequent regeneration or replacement of the catalyst. Sulfur compounds are highly objectionable in hydrocarbon oils as they have an unpleasant odor, tend to cause corrosion and often lead to sludging. These difiiculties have led to various proposals for desulfurization and denitrogenation of almost all petroleum, coal tar and shale oil hydrocarbon fractions which are normally liquid or which can be made fluid at treating temperatures, including light distillates, middle and heavy distillates and even residual stocks. For instance, prior methods have included acid treatment, deasphalting and hydrogenolysis in contact with catalytic material such as molybdenum sulfide, tungsten oxide, nickel sulfide, tungsten sulfide, cobalt molybdate, nickel molybdate, etc. This latter hydrogenation treatment has become commonly known as hydrorefining or hydrofining. Such hydrogen treatment of the feedstocks has become widely accepted, but catalyst compositions are continually being sought which will efiect high rates of hydrogenation with coinciding high denitrogenation rates. Certain catalysts are well known in the art for their excellent hydrogenation activities and others for their excellent denitrogenation activities. Until now the search for one catalyst composition exhibiting ate both of these features had led to the inclusion of both types of catalytic metals upon a single support particle. The effect of this combination, however, is usually resultant catalyst activities in both hydrogenation and denitrogenation which are less than the additive original activities of the parent elements. The rarity is the catalyst having either a denitrogenation or a hydrogenation activity equal to the additive effect of the individual components.

Accordingly, it is desired to devise a method of combining hydrogenation-active catalysts with denitrogenation-active catalysts in such a manner that the combination of the two can be used in a one-step hydrorefining process with results which would be cumulative of at least one of the properties of each catalyst. Such a catalyst combination would be one which would enable the industry to more nearly achieve maximum performance from each of the catalysts without necessitating the use of costly separate reactor systems, recycling or disproportionately large amounts of catalysts.

We have found that by employing a physical mixture of a hydrogenation catalyst and a denitrogenation catalyst in hydrorefining a hydrocarbon stock hydrogenationdenitrogenation activities are obtained which are greater than the expected cumulative results of the two catalysts in at least one of the activities, i.e., they exhibit a greater than cumulative hydrogenation activity or a greater than cumulative denitrogenation activity, or both.

Prior art attempts to reap the benefits of both hydrogenation and denitrogenation catalysts at the same time involved depositing both on the same support particles, but these attempts have usually been in vain. The hydrogenation activity of the thus combined catalysts has usually been less than the sum of the hydrogenation activities of each, rarely has it been equal to the sum. The same is true with respect to the denitrogenation activity. Surprisingly though, when the two catalysts are deposited on separate support particles and then used in admixture we have found that the hydrogenation activity of the mixture is greater than the sum of the hydrogenation activities of each catalyst, or that the denitrogenation activity of the mixture is greater than the sum of the denitrogenation activities of each catalyst, or that both activities are greater.

In accordance with the present invention the physical mixture of catalysts can be a particle-form mixture of the finely divided catalysts, or a single catalyst obtained by mixing of the individual catalyst powders or microspheres followed by macroforming, e.g., extrusion or tableting, or mixtures of macrosize tablets or extrudates of the individual catalysts.

By hydrogenation catalyst is here intended any catalyst having a hydrogenation activity of at least 1.1 and a denitrogenation activity less than 0.7; by denitrogenation catalyst is meant any catalyst having a hydrogenation activity less than 1.0, a denitrogenation activity of at least 0.2 and a ratio of denitrogenation activity to hydrogenation activity of at least 0.6. By hydrogenation activity or hydrogenation rate is meant the rate of change of refractive index of a solution of l-methylnaphthalene and quinoline during hydrogenation of the solution in the presence of the catalyst in question; the units of measurement and conditions of hydrogenation will be explained hereinafter. By denitrogenation activity or denitrogenation rate is meant the rate of decrease of nitrogen concentration of a mixture of l-methylnaphthalene and quinoline being hydrogenated in the presence of the catalyst being tested.

Specifically, the determination of the hydrogenation and denitrogenation activities of a catalyst is made by the following procedure:

Three grams of catalyst of a small enough particle size to pass a 30 mesh sieve is placed in a 300 cc. autoclave, any pretreatment of the catalyst which may be desired to take place at this time. The temperature of the bomb is then brought to 600 F., hydrogen is admitted to a pressure of 1000 p.s.i.g., and stirring at about 600 r.p.m. is begun. At this point 95 ml. of l-methylnaphthalene containing 100 p.p.m. of nitrogen as quinoline is charged to the autoclave. The pressure of the system is maintained at 1000 p.s.i.g. Samples are drawn at timed intervals to measure the extent of change of refractive index. The original refractive index, 22 of the hydrocarbon solution is 1.6180. The refractive index of the solution decreases in direct proportion to the extent of hydrogenation of the l-methylnaphthalene; when 50% thereof has been converted to tetralin the refractive index will be about 1.5800. The heat, hydrogen feeding and stirring are discontinued at this 50% hydrogenation stage and the system cooled to room temperature. The catalyst is removed by filtration and the nitrogen concentration of the product solution is determined.

The hydrogenation activity of the catalyst tested is computed according to the following equation:

Hydrogenation Activity A p.p.m. N

Denitrogenation wherein A p.p.m. N is the difference between the hydrocarbon solutions beginning concentration of nitrogen, i.e., 100 p.p.m., and final concentration of nitrogen.

According to the definitions of the present invention which shall be applied herein and in the claims, a catalyst which, when submitted to the above test, exhibits, for example, ahydrogenation activity of 1.5 and a denitrogenation activity of 0.6 is considered to be a hydrogenation catalyst. On the other hand, a catalyst which, for example, tests for a hydrogenation activity of 0.8 and a denitrogenation activity of 0.5 is, according to the definition, a denitrogenation catalyst since the ratio of its denitrogenation activity to its hydrogenation activity is greater than 0.6 and the latter is less than 1.0.

As stated above, in accordance with the present invention, the catalyst composition employed must have a hydrogenation catalyst and a denitrogenation catalyst existing in their own entity rather than being prepared by impregnation or coprecipitation upon any one support particle. The ratio of the weight amount of hydrogenation catalyst to denitrogenation catalyst can vary from about 3/1 to 1/ 3 but is preferably in an approximate 1/1 ratio.

The catalysts utilized in the physical mixtures of the present invention may be in the particle sizes conventionally employed for the various types of catalyst beds, for instance less than 200 mesh for fluid operations or as macrosize particles in fixed or moving bed processes. Macrosize particles may be prepared by mixing the finely divided hydrogenation catalysts with the finely divided denitrogenation catalysts and extruding or tabletting to particles ranging, for instance, from about & to /2" in diameter and about to l or more in length. Alternatively, the tablets or extrudates need not themselves be comprised of a physical mixture of the two catalysts but, rather, a mixture of tablets or extrurlates consisting only of the hydrogenation catalyst with. tablets or extrudates consisting only of the denitrogenation catalyst may also be employed.

The catalyst having high hydrogenation activity can be selected from any one or more of the more common hydrogenation catalysts known in the art, e.g., catalysts containing one or more of Group VIB and Group VIII metals, e.g., molybdenum, tungsten, cobalt, nickel, platinum, etc., on suitable supports such as inorganic oxides. An excellent hydrogenation catalyst is nickel and molybdena, or cobalt and molybdena, or alumina; the nickel or cobalt may comprise about 140 weight percent of the catalyst, preferably 26%; the molybdena about 530%, preferably 12-20%; and the balance alumina.

The catalyst having high denitrogenation-low hydrogenation activity may, for example, be selected from the supported oxides, sulfides and free metals of elements of Group VIII of the periodic table, or from the supported oxides and sulfides of the metals of Groups VB and VIB of the periodic table, e.g., vanadium, molybdenum, tungsten, etc. Catalysts such as molybdena-silica on alumina and molybdena-titania on alumina are exemplary denitrogenation catalysts. In general, high denitrogenation-low hydrogenation catalysts may be obtained by impregnating supports such as alumina, silica-alumina, titania-alumina, boria-alumina, silica, silica-titania, zirconia, etc., with 5 to 30 weight percent, preferably 12 to 20%, of vanadia, molybdena or tungsten trioxide.

Selection of catalysts for the physical catalyst mixture of this invention is limited, however, only by the aforementioned prerequisites of hydrogenation and denitrogenation activities, and examples given herein of suggested catalysts, percents of catalytic components, etc., are for the purpose of illustration and are in no way intended as limitations of the scope of the present invention.

If an alumina base is employed for either the hydrogeneration or denitrogenation catalyst, it can be any of the known hydrates in an activated or calcined form. Hydrates such as the monohydrate, boehmite; the trihydrates, bayerite I, nordstrandite and gibbsite; or another hydrous alumina which appears to be amorphous and preferably the hydrates which contain a major portion or consist essentially of boehmite may be employed. Calcination converts these hydrates to an activated or gamma family type alumina, e.g., gamma, delta, eta, chi, etc., depending on the composition of the hydrate and choice of calcination conditions. The alumina hydrate can be prepared by any of the conventional methods, for example, an aqueous solution of aluminum chloride or other acidic aluminum salt can be reacted with aqueous ammonium hydroxide to precipitate an essentially boehmite or amorphous alumina hydrate. This material can be washed to remove chloride and ammonium ions.

Such alumina supports are usually characterized by a large surface area ranging from about 60 to 600 or more square meters per gram, preferably greater than about 200 square meters per gram as determined by the BET method. They may also have a relatively large content of pore volume in the pore size range of about 20 to Angstrom units, of the order of greater than 0.3, preferably greater than 0.6, cc. per gram of pore volume in pores of this size, although mechanical steps of forming the catalyst into pellets, as by tabletting or extruding, may affect the amount of pore volume of this size. Typical alumina based catalysts made from boehmite alumina may have essentially no pores greater than about 50 Angstrom units in size and have pore distributions which are similar to those of silica-alumina. On the other hand, the catalysts made from aluminas containing high percentages of the crystalline trihydrates in the precursor alumina mixtures have considerable pore volume in the 100 to 1000 Augstrom units pore size range. These large pores do not occur in many alumina bases derived from the boehmite or monohydrate form of precursor alumina, either before of after calcination. The boehmite type of precursor alumina is often characterized by crystallite size of the order of 40 Angstrom units before and after calcination and contains no pores larger than 50 Angstrom units.

The catalytically active metals may be deposited on their respective supports in any suitable manner. One feasible method is to deposit the metal components on the support via an aqueous medium either as water-soluble compounds in solution, although an excess of the water-soluble materials may be present to give a slurry, or as relatively water-insoluble compounds in slurry form. Deposition of the catalysts on the carrier can be followed by various calcination and/ or reduction processes.

As is well known in the art of hydrorefining, the hydrogenation and denitrogenation activities of catalysts are enhanced when the activating metals are converted to their sulfide forms. The catalyst compositions of the present invention may likewise be sulfided. The sulfiding step may be accomplished in many different ways, but generally comprises passing hydrogen sulfide, either pure or diluted with another gas such as, for instance, hydrogen over a bed of the activated catalyst mixture at temperatures usually from about 400 to 700 F., for a time sufficient to convert a significant portion of the catalytic metals to 6 hydrogen sulfide for ten minutes at room temperature with stirring (600 rpm).

The system was depressured to 50 p.s.i.g. hydrogen sulfide and heating started with stirring. The temperature was raised from room temperature to 600 F., overnight (ca. 16 hours), at this point stirring was stopped, hydrogen admitted to a total pressure of 1000 p.s.i.g., 95 ml. of hydrocarbon pressured from a blowcase to the bomb and the stirring was restarted. The system was such that a continual pressure of 1000 p.s.i.g. hydrogen was on the contents of the bomb at all times. At intervals of minutes or multiples thereof a small sample (23 ml.) was withdrawn from the bomb and a refractive index taken on the sample. When the refractive index reached 1.5800 (representing approximately hydrogenation to the tetralin stage) the heat, hydrogen, and stirring were shut off and the bomb cooled to room temperature. Decalin production was checked by gas chromatography but none was found in these runs. The bomb was dismantled and the hydrocarbon separated from the catalyst by filtration. Products were submitted for total N (p.p.m.) analyses to determine denitrogenation activity.

The following tables give the results obtained with several of the catalyst mixtures contemplated by the present their respective sulfides. Alternatively, the catalyst may be 25 invention and with comparable prior art catalysts.

TABLE I Conditions: 600 F., 1,000 p.s.ig, 1,000 rpm. Feed: ml. l-methylnaphthalene plus ppm. N as quinoline Calculated:

A 'nD Xl0 /min A ppm. N/min Observed:

A n Xl0 /min A ppm. N/min sulfided by the processing of a sulfur-containing feed. Air is preferably excluded from the catalyst after this sulfiding step.

The hydrorefining of the hydrocarbon stock is conducted under conventional hydrogenation conditions; generally a temperature of about 400 to 800 F., preferably 500 to 700 F., a pressure of about 0 to 3,000 pounds per square inch gauge (p.s.i.g.), preferably 100 to 2,000 p.s.i.g., a weight hourly space velocity of feed to total catalyst In Table I are given the hydrogenation and denitrogenation activities for a nickel-molybdate on alumina and rhenium-ruthenium on alumina catalyst. In Run III is given the result obtained with a physical mixture of these two catalysts. The observed rates of hydrogenation and denitrogenation obtained with the mixture are both better than the calculated rates if one expected an additive effect (calculated rate for Run III is the sum of the observed rates for Runs I and II) TABLE II Conditions: 600 F., 1,000 p.s.i.g., 1,000 rpm. Feed: 95 ml. l-methylnaphthalene plus 100 ppm. N as quinoline Run I IV V VI Catalyst 4% Ni16% M003] 25% VzOa/ 4%Nil6% Mom/A1203, 3 g. 4% N i16% M00 -23% V20 A1 0 3 g. A1203, 3 g. 25% Wo /A 3 g. A120 3 g.

Calculated:

A m3 Xl0 /min 1. 931 1. 931

A p.p.m. N/min 0. 802 0.802 Observed:

A nD X10 /min 1. 49 0. 441 2. 20 1. 24

A ppm. N/min. 0. 432 0. 370 0. 767 0. 402

. (WHSV) of about 0.1 to 10, preferably 0.25 to 5 WHSV,

In Table II are shown the results obtained with a nickel-molybdate-alumina catalyst and vanadia-alumina catalyst. Vanadia-alumina had low hydrogenation-high denitrogenation activity. In Run V is given the results with a mixture of these two catalysts. The observed hydrogenation rate is higher than that calculated on an additive basis of the hydrogenation activities and the denitrogenation rate is slightly lower but within experimental error. Combination of these two catalysts upon the same support particles by impregnation yielded the catalyst composition reported in Run VI. This catalyst composition gave results inferior to the baseline catalyst (Run I) and the mixture of the two catalyst powders 7 8 (Run V). This gives further evidence of the uniqueness calculated) have increased by a factor of greater than of this system of employing a denitrogenation catalyst unity. Also, comparison of denitrogenation rates for Runs in combination with a hydrogenation catalyst. III and V show that these systems give higher denitrogen- TABLE III Conditions: 600 F., 1,000 p.s.l.g., 1,000 r.p.m. Feed: 95 ml. Lrnethylnaphthalene 100 p.p.m. N as quinoline Run I VII VIII Catalyst 4% Ni16% M003] (3011120 3 g. 4% Ni16% Moog/A120 3 g.

A1203, 3 g. 001 11204, 3 g.

Calculated:

A 'nn X /min 1. 72 A ppm. Nlmin 0. 827 Observed:

A nD X10 /rnin 1. 49 0. 23 1.98 A p.p.n1. Nlmin 0. 432 0. 395 0. 616

In Table III is given another example of combining ation rates than those resulting from doubling the catalyst an active hydrogenation catalyst (Run I) with a decharge. Numerically the difference in these denitrogennitrogenation catalyst (Run VI-I) under the conditions of ation rates are not great, but if one compares nitrogen in this invention. Run VIII gives the results obtained with the product, the slight dificrences in rate means operating such a mixture and shows that the observed hydrogenat a product N level of 2 p.p.m. or less compared to ation activity was greater than that calculated by the 8 ppm.

addition of the hydrogenation activities of the individual This difference in nitrogen content of the product catalysts, although the denitrogenation activity did not rise greatly atfects the catalyst activity if the product is to the calculated amount. r further processed under hydrocracking conditions, and Although it would appear that the same results exaffects conversion rate and aging rate of the catalyst. perienced by the processes of this invention could be Sulfided molybdena catalysts also exhibit excellent deachieved by doubling the charge of the baseline catalyst nitrogenation properties with poor hydrogenation activity.

(4% Nil6% M00 A1 0 or increasing the contact Tables V through VII give the results obtained with these time of the feed with the catalyst, such a supposition is catalysts on various supports and with difierent hydrogencontroverted by the comparative results illustrated 1n ation catalysts.

TABLE V Conditions: 600 F., 1,000 p.s.i.g., 1,000 r.p.m. Feed: 95 m1. l-methylnaphthalene plus 100 p.p.m. N as qulnoline Run I X XI Catalyst Calculated:

A nD X10 /min" 2.176 A p.p.m. N/ 0.846 Observed:

A nD 10 /min 1. 49 o. 686 2. 90

A p.p.m. N/min o. 432 0. 414 0. 770

Table IV. The hydrogenation-denitrogenation rates therein are based upon the ratio of the observed to the calculated rates.

TABLE IV Run I III V VIII IX Catalyst Observed] 4% N i16% M003] 4% N l16% M003] 4% Ni-16% M003] Calculated 4% Nil6% M003, A1703, 3 g. I a, g. A1103, 3 g. 4% Ni-16% MoO lAlgOi, a g. A1202, 3 g. 1% Ito-1% Ian/A1103, 3 g. 25% MOS/A1203, a COA1204, a g. 4% Nilfi% MOOa/AiZOa, a g.

I-Iydrogenatio 1 1.35 1.2 1.15 0.93 Deuitrogenation 1 1. 09 0.975 0. 745 0. 88

Thus, with the baseline catalyst, as one increases the Nickel-molybdena-alumina when mixed with a molybamount of catalyst (Run 1X) correspondmg Increase dena-alumina catalyst gave higher hydrogenation rates in activity is not obtained. The ratio of hydrogenation and denitrogenation rates (observed/calculated) increases than that f for mdlvldual components by a factor of less than unity w the other catalysts Denitrogenation activity was sllghtly lower than calculated (Runs LII, V and VIII) hydrogenation ratios (observed/ but not enough to offset the gain in hydrogenation.

TABLE VI Conditions: 600 F., 1,000 p.s.i.g., 1,000 r.p.m. Feed: 95 ml. l-methylnaphthalene plus 100 p.p.m. N as quinoline Run I XII XIII XIV XV Catalyst 4% Ni16% MoO 16% Mom-S102- 4% Ni16% MOa-A12Oa,3 g. 16% MoO -Ti0z- 4% Ni16% Moo -M20 3 g.

A120 3 g. A120 3 g. 16% MOOs-SiOz-AlzOa, 3 g. A1203, 3 g. 16% Mo0 -TiOrAlz0 3 g.

Calculated:

A nD XIO /min 2.36 2. 26 A p.p.m. N/miIL- 0. 965 0. s84 Observed:

A7m X /mln 1. 49 0. 870 3 27 0.775 3.49 A p.p.m. Nlmin 0.432 0. 533 1 09 0.452 1. 06

Table VI gives the results from mixing a nickel-molybcracked distillates, coal tar distillates and the like. These dena-alumina catalyst with a molybdena on silica-alumina catalyst compositions have been found effective for the or titania-alumina catalyst. In both cases (Runs XIII pretreatment of feedstocks for catalytic cracking includand XV) the observed hydrogenation and denitrogenation ing reduction in the concentration of sulfur, oxygen and rates were greater than the calculated rates. nitrogen compounds, and of components which tend to Tungsten sulfide, which also exhibits excellent deproduce excessive quantities of carbonaceous deposits in nitrogenation activity with .poor hydrogenation actl-vlty, catalytic cracking, as well as the hydrogenation of such was also tried on silica-alumina and titania-alurnina stocks to improve conversion and selectivity in catalytic carriers and likewise gave increased rates over those cracking. Although the test examples were conducted as calculated for mixtures with the standard nickel-molybbatchwise operations, it is to be understood that the dena-alumina hydrogenation catalyst. hydrorefining process using the catalyst compositions of In Table II was shown the results of combining the the present invention can be conducted batchwise or conhydrogenation and denitrogenation catalysts upon the tinuously by methods well known in the art. same support particles. The resulting activity is below It is claimed: that calculated for the addition of the individual com- 30 1. In a process for hydrorefining nitrogen and sulfurponents. In Table VII are compared the results obtained contaminated hydrocarbons the improvement which comwith the individual catalysts, with a physical mixture, and prises contacting said hydrocarbons with molecular hydrowith a mixed extrudate. gen under hydrogenation conditions in the presence of a TABLE VII Conditions: 600 F., 1,000 p.s.i.g., 1,000 r.p.m. Feed: 95 ml. l-methylnaphthalene plus 100 p.p.m. N as quinoline Run XVI XVII XVIII XIX Catalyst 16% MOOrSiOg-AlaOa, 3 g. 16% M003-NiA1204, 3 g. 16% MOOa-NiAlzO4, 3 g. 16% MoOg-NiAlgOs 16% MoO3Si0 AliO 3 g. Sim-A1203, 6 g.

Calculated:

A ns xloilmin 2.890 2. 890 A p.p.m. N lmln 1. 079 1. 079 Observed:

A nD X104/min 0. 870 2. 02 4. 26 3. 30 A p.p.m. N/m111 0. 533 0. 546 1. 032 1. 066

Runs XVI and XVII give the results for the molybdena physical mixture of (A) a catalyst having a hydrogenaon silica-alumina and molybdena on nickel aluminate tion activity of at least 1.1 and a denitrogenation activity catalysts, respectively. Run XVIII gives the results for a less than 0.7, said catalyst consisting essentially of a physical mixture of the powders of these two catalysts support having deposited thereon catalytically-active com- Run XIX was performed with the mixed extrudate of ponents containing at least one metal selected from the these two components. It was prepared by extruding the group consisting of nickel, cobalt, tungsten, molybdenum nickel aluminate and silica-alumina, calcining, and then and platinum, and (B) a catalyst having a hydrogenation impregnating with sufiicient molybdena to yield 16 wt. activity of less than 1.0, a denitrogenation activity of percent M00 based on the weight of the catalyst. Both at least 0.2 and a ratio of denitrogenation activity to methods yield active catalyst compositions with hydrohydrogenation activity of at least 0.6, said catalyst congenation activities greater than the calculated values and sisting essentially of a support having deposited theredenitrogenation activities of high activity and almost on catalytically-active components containing at least one approaching the calculated values. With such high denimetal selected from the group consisting of metals of trogenation activities these differences between observed Group VIII of the periodic table, vanadium, molybdenum and calculated values are within experimental error. and tungsten, the weight ratio of (A) to (B) being from The catalyst compositions of the present invention have about 3/1 to about l/ 3, and said physical mixture being been found to be useful for the removal of non-hydrosuch that (A) and (B) are individually supported on carbon impurities and for the hydrogenation of unsatudiscrete particles. rated, i.e., olefinic, aromatic, etc., hydrocarbons from a 2. The process of claim 1 wherein said hydrogenation variety of petroleum, coal tar and shale oil fractions for conditions include a temperature of about 400 to 800 the production of chemicals, lubricating oils and fuels. F., a pressure of about 03,000 p.s.i.g., a weight hourly The catalyst compositions of the present invention can "be space velocity of about 0.1 to 10 WHSV and a molar used for treating mineral hydrocarbon stocks comprising ratio of hydrogen to hydrocarbon feed of from about base stocks for lubricants, lighter petroleum distillates 1/1 to 20/1. such as a gas oil for catalytic cracking and hydrocrack- 3. The process of claim 2 wherein said hydrogenation ing, wax distillates from paraflinic crudes, catalytically conditions include a temperature of 500 to 700 F., a

1 1 pressure of 100 to 2,000 p.s.i.g., a weight hourly space velocity of 0.25 to 5 WHSV and a molar ratio of hydrogen to hydrocarbon feed of from 1/ 1 to 10/ 1.

4. The process of claim 1 wherein (A) is a sulfided nickel and molybdena on alumina catalyst and (B) is a sulfided molybdena on titania-alumina catalyst.

5. The process of claim 1 wherein (A) is a sulfided nickel and molybdena on alumina catalyst and (B) is a sulfided molybdena on silica-alumina catalyst.

6. The process of claim 1 wherein (A) is a nickel and molyhdena on alumina catalyst and (B) is a vanadia on alumina catalyst.

7. In a process for hydrorefining nitrogen and sulfurcontaminated hydrocarbons the improvement which comprises contacting said hydrocarbons with molecular hydrogen under hydrogenation conditions, including a temperature of 500 to 700 F., a pressure of 100 to 2,000 p.s.i.g., a weight hourly space velocity of 0.25 to 5 WHSV and a molar ratio of hydrogen to hydrocarbon feed of from 1/1 to 10/ l, in the presence of a physical mixture of (A) a sulfided nickel and molybdena on alumina catalyst and (B) a sulfided molybdena on silicaalumina catalyst, the weight ratio of (A) to (B) being from about 3/1 to 1/3.

8. In a process for hydrorefining nitrogen and sulfurcontaminated hydrocarbons the improvement which comprises contacting said hydrocarbons with molecular hydrogen under hydrogenation conditions, including a temperature of 500 to 700 F., a pressure of 100 to 2,000 p.s.i.g., a weight hourly space velocity of 0.25 to 5 WHSV and a molar ratio of hydrogen to hydrocarbon feed of from about 1/1 to 10/1, in the presence of a. physical mixture of (A) a nickel and molybdena on alumina catalyst and (B) a vanadia on alumina catalyst, the weight ratio of (A) to (B) being from about 3:1 to 1:3.

References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 3,003,953 10/1961 Evans 208254 3,287,252 11/1966 Young 208-11l 3,331,769 7/ 1967 Gatsis 208264 DELBERT E. GANTZ, Primary Examiner.

G. I. CRASANAKIS, Assistant Examiner.

US. Cl. X.R. 208217, 254 

